4 Comments

Data: More than just a great character from Star Trek: TNG

The other day, I learned that the Harper Government (HG) has decided to eliminate the compulsory long census form, and replace it with a voluntary survey instead.  Their reason?

“Our feeling was that the change was to make a reasonable limit on what most Canadians felt was an intrusion into their personal privacy in terms of answering the longer form,”  – Erik Waddell, spokesman for Industry Minister Tony Clement.

“Most Canadians”?  Really?  As a researcher, I’m very interested in which data, exactly, lead the HG to conclude that “most Canadians” feel that the long census form is an invasion of their privacy.  (Did they take a poll?  Send out a survey?  Cold-call a random sampling of Canadians?  Mail out a questionnaire?  Develop a census on the census?)  Thanks to the article linked above, I now know of one such individual:  Don Rogers, the man responsible for the “Count Me Out” campaign against the census.  According to him,

“The Canadian census was originally a count of heads and cows … and we would certainly like it to revert back, if not all the way to that point, but to a collection of very basic, minimal information […] There’s no need to ask how many rooms in your house, there’s no need to ask how many hours of unpaid work do the members of your household do.”

Hmm…  It seems that Rogers isn’t aware that census data are a) anonymous; b) used by institutions other than the government, such as public interest groups, non-profit organizations, universities, NGOs, public and private research centres, community agencies, as well as individual members of the general public; and c) analyzed and disseminated in aggregate form.  So, he can lay his libertarian fears to rest.  The Big Bad Government won’t be banging down his door any time soon.  (Unless he tries to pay for his health care services in chickens which, given the thrust of his anti-census argument, is not outside the realm of possibility.)

Here’s the problem with the HG’s latest decision:  not all data are created equal.  They are profoundly affected by source, sample size, methods of collection, and methods of analysis.  Weaken one or more of these areas, and you reduce the reliability and validity (and, therefore, the utility) of your data.  So, the HG’s decision to weaken the source and sample size of the most important, policy-relevant, information about who Canadians are –  how we live, where we live, where we work, how we get from Point A to Point B, our level of education, our countries of birth, our levels of income, the structure of our families, the conditions of our workplaces, the status of our health, and so on – will also weaken the quality of that information.  In effect, the HG is telling us that we don’t deserve to have public policy decisions, which can improve the quality of our lives, informed by reliable and valid data.  What we do deserve, apparently, is the death of smart government, a less-competitive economy, and a weakened democracy.

Thanks, HG.

Thanks a lot.
______________________________________________________

Links
Census change PM’s latest move in dumbing down Canada

Don’t cut long census form:  Liberals

Former StatsCan head slams census decision by Tories

Petition
Keep the Canadian Census Long Form

Advertisements

4 comments on “Data: More than just a great character from Star Trek: TNG

  1. I agree… This is a shocking and disturbing development!

  2. […] the Harper government would hobble the government’s ability to deliver public services) and Counternarratives pointed out that the reasoning behind the removal of the long-form census – privacy concerns […]

  3. If we collected census data only from the willing, certain groups of the population would be left out entirely… like the big-gov’ment-fearing conservatives. Not being counted in the census means they don’t get representation from said gov’ment. No representation means they have no vehicle to push their skewed ideals.

    Maybe this is a good thing… 😉

    I kid, I kid, we need accurate data, even from the people we’d rather not include. But still, that could be the one and only unexpected benefit from an otherwise ridiculous situation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: